Sunday, July 6, 2025
Home Blog Page 2171

Burmese army expands in Karen state

2

Oct 5, 2009 (DVB), Burmese troops have stepped up their presence in southern Karen state, close to an area occupied by a key Burmese ceasefire group, a military analyst on the Thai-Burma border said.

Troop numbers in the area have swelled in recent weeks, according to the analyst speaking on condition of anonymity.

An infantry unit has been deployed near to Payathonsu (also known as Three Pagodas Pass), a major crossing point on the Thai-Burma border, while other units have been replaced.

Reinforcements have also been sent to Bayinnaung Hill near to Payathonsu.

"The positions where the army is expanding its troops are not far from where the New Mon State Party [NMSP] has set up checkpoints," the analyst said.

He added however that it was unclear whether the reinforcements signified concern over the NMSP.

"The Southeastern [Regional Military Command] has ordered its troops to conduct development projects at their positions," he said.

"Troops have been directed to provide assistance to locals in development projects, such as construction and reconstruction of roads and health and educational services, and to avoid use of forced labour."

He said that the move could be aimed at gaining more credit for the army, and persuade more civilians to ally themselves with the ruling State Peace and Development Council (SPDC).

Tension between the government and ceasefire groups has risen this year following pressure on ceasefire groups to disarm and form border guard forces.

The government has said that the move would bring ceasefire groups back into the 'legal fold', although many of the groups have so far resisted, fearing subjugation to the ruling generals.

It was this factor that sparked fighting in the Kokang region of Burma's northeastern Shan state between Burmese troops and a Kokang rebel group in August.

Several members of the NMSP announced last month that they would be merging with the Mon National Democratic Front to form a political party, but are yet to announce whether it will participate in elections next year.

Reporting by Min Lwin

Suu Kyi meets with senior junta official

0

Oct 5, 2009 (DVB), Detained Burma opposition leader Aung San San Kyi held rare talks with a senior government official on Saturday, following a letter sent by her to junta supremo Than Shwe.

Suu Kyi, who last week had an appeal against her house arrest rejected by a Rangoon court, met with junta liaison officer Aung Kyi for the first time in two years.

The state-run New Light of Myanmar newspaper said on Saturday that the meeting, which lasted for 40 minutes at a guesthouse in Rangoon, was organized after Suu Kyi last month wrote a letter to Than Shwe.

The letter reportedly offered suggestions for how the junta and NLD could cooperate over the lifting of sanctions on Burma.

National League for Democracy (NLD) party spokesperson Nyan Win said that party members welcomed the meeting, despite it being unclear what exactly was discussed.

"That's what the NLD and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi have been looking for; to hold meetings and talks, and to negotiate," he said. "We hope that there are more crucial meetings in the future."

Senior NLD member Win Tin said however that the party remained wary of any propaganda attempts by the government.

The meeting came in the same week that the US announced it would begin direct engagement with the ruling junta in Burma, after years of isolationist policy.

Win Tin said that if the meeting took place to "buy some credit" for the junta following Washington's announcement, "then there wouldn't be much outcome from this".

Suu Kyi on Friday had an appeal against her house arrest rejected by a Rangoon court. She was sentenced in August to 18 months under house arrest following a visit by US citizen John Yettaw to her compound in May.

The announcement by the US comes after Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced in February that more than a decade of sanctions on Burma had failed to shift the ruling junta.

The release of Suu Kyi, who has spent 14 of the past 20 years under house arrest, has been labeled by the US as a prerequisite for the lifting of sanctions, while critics of the junta see her verdict as a ploy to keep her in detention beyond the elections next year.

Reporting by Thurein Soe and Ahunt Phone Myat

China and Russia call for Suu Kyi's release

2

Oct 5, 2009 (DVB), China has joined with Russia and India in calling for the release of all political prisoners in Burma, including Aung San Suu Kyi, at a UN Human Rights Council session last week.

The Council "expressed grave concern at the recent conviction and sentencing of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, and called for her immediate and unconditional release", a press release said on Friday.

It also "called upon the Government of Myanmar [Burma] to release all political prisoners, immediately and unconditionally, enabling them to participate fully in the 2010 elections".

The 47-member body includes the United Kingdom, France and Italy. The United States joined last month after years of heavy criticism of the Council.

The move may come as some surprise to Burma observers, following years of staunch support for the ruling junta from China, Russia and India.

Burma analyst Larry Jagan said however that it would be wrong to assume that China has changed its stance on human rights in Burma.

"The [UNHRC] works on consensus and China is in a position where it cannot really obstruct a report or resolution on human rights in Burma," he said.

"Essentially we've had 21 years of various human rights bodies passing the same kind of resolution, and nothing has ever really happened."

China in particular has long been seen as a crutch for Burma, and has twice vetoed UN Security Council resolutions calling for an end to human rights abuses by the Burmese government.

"You need to compare this [UNHRC statement] with the fact that China deliberately made sure that Burma was not going to be discussed at the UN Security Council this month," he said. "I think it's a misreading of the situation to be focusing on China here."

Tension between the two countries has risen in recent months, triggered by clashes between Burmese troops and an ethnic rebel group in northern Burma which forced some 37,000 refugees into China.

The statement came during a week in which the US announced it would directly engage with the ruling junta in Burma. Courts in Burma on Friday also rejected an appeal by Suu Kyi over her house arrest.

Although it was China that proposed increasing dialogue between Burma and the US, Jagan said that Beijing "is suspicious and alarmed at the possibility of increased US involvement in Burma".

Reporting by Francis Wade

Thailand faces ‘wave of Burmese refugees’

0

Oct 2, 2009 (DVB), The Burmese refugee situation in Thailand may deteriorate as Burma's ruling junta prepares for elections next year, an international refugee group has warned.

A report released on Wednesday by Refugees International said that the Burmese army's campaign to transform ethnic rebel groups, who populate the country's border areas, into border patrol forces could spark fighting.

The campaign "has resulted in new tensions throughout regions of the country already under de facto control of the ethnic armies and affiliated political groups", the report said.

"If the Burmese government pursues this border force policy aggressively, Thailand could face more waves of refugees entering multiple regions of the country."

The report cited fighting in Burma's eastern Karen state in June between the junta-backed Democratic Karen Buddhist Army (DKBA) and the Karen National Union (KNU), which forced some 4,000 refugees into Thailand.

Groups have warned that this could be an indication of what is to come if the Burmese regime continues to pressure armed ethnic groups.

"[The refugee situation] is largely going to depend on how the regime proceeds and what their next step is going to be," said an official from the Thailand-Burma Border Consortium (TBBC), adding that "our expectations are all over the place".

"It could be anything, starting from the repatriation of people from [Thailand] back to Burma to another extreme, which is tens of thousands of new refugees fleeing, into Thailand."

The official said however that the situation "remains fluid" and that all possible outcomes of the border force campaign are being considered.

Reporting by Matt Cunningham

Monks demand US policy ‘timeline’ as threats continue

2

Oct 2, 2009 (DVB), United States' engagement with the Burmese junta must be linked to a clearly defined time scale with comprehensible goals, according to an international network of Burmese monks.

The New York-based International Burmese Monks Organisation (IBMO) welcomed the announcement by the US on Monday that it would begin direct engagement with Burma, via a letter sent to the Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs.

"US direct diplomacy with the regime should not be an open-ended process, but should take place within a reasonable timeframe and with clear benchmarks," the letter said.

Dozens of monks, including members of the IBMO and the All Burma Monks Association (ABMA), protested on Tuesday outside of the building in New York where US officials held talks with a Burmese government delegation.

A statement released by IBMO expressed frustration that talks where overwhelmingly bilateral, and didn't include Burma's opposition movement.

"We are disappointed that neither monks nor members of Burma's democracy movement were invited to testify," the statement said.

Meanwhile, monks inside Burma are reportedly preparing to boycott religious services for the ruling junta, unless some 240 monks are released from prison.

A spokesperson for the ABMA, U Dhamma Wuntha, said it was unlikely the government would apologise so the boycott, known as Pattanikkujjana, would start tomorrow.

"The [government] doesn't have courage to admit its wrong doing; they are cowards," he said.

Authorities have reportedly threatened monks with arrest should they run the boycott. One monk said that security had been tightened, and monks were unable to leave the monasteries after 9pm.

Ashin Pannasiri, a veteran of the September 2007 monk-led uprising, who escaped from jail to India, said that intimidaiton was likely to continue.

"The junta is really afraid of monks, so they will continue to arrest monks. Some monks are still missing [after being] arrested a few weeks ago".

Reporting by Joseph Allchin and Naw Say Phaw

Still not safe: the trafficked lives of Burmese refugees

1

Two years ago Di Di and her family were farmers in Burma. When her husband died from snakebite, the Burmese soldiers came and seized their land. One week later three soldiers raped Di Di in the middle of the day in front of all her village neighbors. Nobody stepped in to help because they were too afraid.

Ashamed and scared, she decided to find an agent to help her escape from Burma. Di Di met a man who told her he would take her through Thailand all the way to Malaysia, because she could make more money there. She didn’t have the funds but he guaranteed her a job and said he would deduct the fee from her first few paychecks.

Once Di Di got to Malaysia the man kept her under lock and key in a small room. She was let out during the day to work in the restaurant upstairs as a dishwasher. She never saw her pay and several nights a week the man who brought her to Malaysia would unlock the door and rape her. He told her if she tried to escape he would tell the police she was there illegally and they would put her in prison. When Di Di missed her period she told the man he had made her pregnant. He took her to a jungle hut outside Kuala Lumpur and made her drink a concoction of strong alcohol and bitter herbs.

“He made me lie down on the floor and then he stepped on my stomach, just to be sure to make the baby come out. He stepped on my chest and my belly. He made me go upside down on my head. He was very heavy, he looked like a giant and he stepped on me. He said: ‘If the baby comes out alive I will kill you.’ Then he walked out and left Di Di writhing in pain and crying on the floor.

Fortunately some local people in the jungle heard her cries and called a Burmese community group based in Kuala Lumpur who rescued Di Di. When they found her she was still pregnant but barely alive.

As the situation inside the country deteriorates, Burma becomes a major source country for the trafficking of children, women and men for the purpose of commercial sexual exploitation and forced labor in the fishing industries, factories and for domestic servitude. People are trafficked out of Burma generally in three ways: taken by force; sold by desperate and/or drug addicted parents; or lured by the deceptive practices of traffickers posing as ‘brokers’, ‘smugglers’ or ‘agents’ – people who promise safe transit out of Burma in exchange for a fee.

Once away from their families and friends the victims find themselves living lives as modern slaves in Thailand, Malaysia, China, and also in India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. Worldwide, trafficking is the most rapidly growing and third largest criminal industry after the drug and arms tradesits profits are quick and risk is considered low. According to an International Labor Organization report in 2005 the human trafficking business generates an estimated $US32 billion annually.

Recently there have been numerous reports indicating that some members of the Thai and Malaysian governments have been profiting from the sale of Burmese refugees and migrants. In Malaysia, the US senate foreign relations committee (SFRC) confirmed these allegations in a report published in April 2009.

In Burma Htut Kuang had worked as a ferryboat driver. When the soldiers opened fire on his boat he fled and made his way to Malaysia. At the time he was 21 years old. “I just jump in the water and swim to Thailand. I didn’t get to say my family goodbye.”

After two years Htut Kuang received official refugee status from the United Nations High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR). Ten days later, he was arrested on the street for not having a passport. He told the police that he was “an official person of concern to the United Nations”, whereby they tore up his card and sent him to prison.

After Htut Kuang served his sentence, he, along with 11 other Burmese boys and young men who were with him in the prison, were loaded onto a bus for deportation to Thailand. At the Thai-Malaysia border the Malaysian immigration officials forced them to cross a small stream where a group of armed men awaited them on the other side. These men told the group that they had purchased them from Malaysian immigration for $US140 each. “You belong to us,” they said. “We bought you from Malaysian immigration and now we need to make a profit.”

Each boy or man was given a chance to call family or friends to raise the ransom for his release—about $US700 per person. Htut Kuang called his mother back in Burma, though he knew she would not be able to send him the money. Not wanting to upset her he told her he was going away to work on a fishing boat and would be back soon. He hung up the phone and began to weep. One of the boys patted his back and whispered to him, “You are a good boy, a good son.”

Htut Kuang’s boat was so far out to sea he never saw land. Drinking water came by small ship and the boys ate the fish that were too rotten to sell. If one of them became sick the captains would beat him. If they didn’t recover after a few days they were shot and thrown into the sea. Htut Kuang remained captive on that boat for three years.

According the US SFRC, there are an estimated 90,000 Burmese refugees in Malaysia. The UNHCR has registered about half that number. The US State Department Annual Trafficking in Persons Report (2009) estimates 20 percent of the victims unable to meet the traffickers’ monetary demands are sold into forced labor and prostitution.

Nai Kasauh Mon is the director of The Human Rights Foundation of Monland. Kasauh Mon’s foundation together with the Women and Children’s Rights Project of Southern Burma recently published a comprehensive report, “No Where To Go,” which is based on interviews conducted with 71 Burmese trafficking victims between 2004 to 2009 from 19 townships in Mon State, Karen State, Tenasserim Division, Pegu Division, Rangoon Division and Mandalay Division.

The victims in the report are mostly trafficked from Burma into Thailand and Malaysia, but Kasauh Mon states that Shan and Chin girls are particularly vulnerable to traffickers who are looking for young brides to sell to men in China. The demand for brides is a result of the one child policy in China—which has created a disproportionate ratio of males to females.

Another recent phenomenon involves traffickers who have infiltrated the refugee camps in Thailand. There are nine official refugee camps along the Thai-Burma border providing shelter to an estimated 156,000 Burmese people most of whom have fled the junta’s forces as they try to contain ethnic rebel armies. The largest camp is Mae La, housing nearly 50,000 mostly Karen refugees.

The traffickers pose as refugees and lure the people in the camp to go with their new “friend” who promises them jobs so that they can live freely, outside the camps. Once in the cities the refugees are sold to employers who do not pay them and commonly abuse them both sexually and physically—just like Di Di in Malaysia, because they are in Thailand illegally, they are threatened with arrest and prison terms if they try to escape.

Suzie, a three-year old girl from the Akha tribe, represents a situation common to children who live in the bustling border towns of Mae Sai and Mae Sot. Her family immigrated to Thailand when Suzie was an infant. Because they didn’t speak any of the predominant languages they struggled as street beggars. Several traffickers had already preyed on the family, deceiving her four adolescent sisters into working as prostitutes in karaoke bars where they thought they would be given jobs as waitresses.

Some time after the sisters had left, Suzie’s mother, desperate to feed her little brother, sold Suzie to a man for $US20. One of her sisters found out, and impassioned by the wish that her baby sister not end up a prostitute like herself, she stole into the trafficker’s home and was able to bring Suzie back to her mother. All of the girls from Suzie’s family have since been rescued by a local NGO in Chiang Mai.

While policies inside Burma breed the conditions that foster opportunities for trafficking, many human rights advocates believe that the governments of neighboring ASEAN states are in a position to help eradicate the trafficking that occurs within their borders. Neither Malaysia nor Thailand distinguishes between refugees and illegal immigrants. As a result, neither has signed the 1951 Geneva Convention protecting the fundamental rights of refugees. If these two nations were to become signatories to the Convention the refugees might become less vulnerable to the entrapment of traffickers. Signing the Convention would also provide a stronger mandate to prosecute anyone involved with trafficking, including those within the governments’ official ranks.

Perhaps Htut Kuang frames it best. When asked what he would like to tell the world about his experience, he looks at his torn sneakers and his usual smile fades.

“I want the world to know what is happening inside of Burma; what our bad government is doing. But also I want people to know how we have to stay in another country where we are still not safe. Everyone here wants to catch us. We need the big countries to help.”

Feel the passion for press freedom ignite within you.

Join us as a valued contributor to our vibrant community, where your voice harmonizes with the symphony of truth. Together, we'll amplify the power of free journalism.

Lost Password?
Contact