Tuesday, February 27, 2024
HomeUncategorizedUS official says obstructed efforts in Burma cost lives

US official says obstructed efforts in Burma cost lives

Jun 2, 2008 (AP)‚ Burma’s obstruction of international efforts to help cyclone victims cost "tens of thousands of lives," defence secretary Robert Gates said on Saturday in his strongest condemnation to date of the military government there.

"We have reached out, frankly, to Myanmar multiple times during this crisis in very direct ways," Gates told an international audience. "It’s not been us that have been deaf and dumb in response to the pleas of the international community, but the government of Myanmar. We have reached out, they have kept their hands in their pockets."

With US, British and French Navy ships off the coast of Burma poised to leave because they have been blocked from delivering assistance to the ravaged country, Gates said the US will not forcefully bring in supplies without permission of the government, and will continue to "respect the sovereignty" of Burma.

The growing displeasure with the Burmese government has permeated this week’s conference on international security, coming up in nearly all conversations between leaders from around the world. Military officials have indicated that they are about to withdraw the US Navy ships within days, since it does not appear that the Burmese government will change its mind and allow the vessels to unload their supplies.

Gates said the US has provided aid to other countries while respecting their independence. But with Burma, he said, "the situation has been very different ‚ at a cost of tens of thousands of lives. Many other countries besides the United States also have felt hindered in their efforts."

The Pentagon chief also rejected one conference questioner’s suggestion that America is using sanctions and isolating Burma, similar to failed US policies against Cuba. And he insisted that efforts to provide aid will continue.

In a wide-ranging speech, Gates looked ahead to the next White House administration, saying the new US president will inherit the worrisome issue of North Korea’s nuclear ambitions but will continue America’s enduring commitment to Asia.

While he said he could not make specific policy predictions for the next administration, Gates told the annual Shangri-la conference that there will be "no change in our drive to temper North Korea’s ambitions, a policy not possible without China’s valued cooperation."

Despite the often divergent views of the Republican and Democratic candidates, Gates said he is confident that the strong US ties to Asia will continue "no matter which political party occupies the White House next year."

"Any speculation in the region about the United States losing interest in Asia strikes me as either preposterous, or disingenuous, or both," he said.

The reference to China was one of several in a speech that sounded two distinct tones on the communist giant ‚ at times extending a friendly hand and at others offering a subtle but sombre warning.

Gates first noted that relations with China have improved, and that leaders have begun a series of discussions on issues to "help us understand one another better, and to avoid possible misunderstanding."

A long-sought direct telephone link between the US and China has finally been established, and Gates said he used it recently to speak with the defence minister.

On the other hand, Gates took unmistakable jabs at China without mentioning its name, calling, for example, for greater openness about military modernisation in Asia.

In recent annual reports the Pentagon has criticized China for its massive military buildup, saying its motives and spending are unclear.

"We desire to work with every country in Asia to deepen our understanding of their military and defense finances, and to do so on a reciprocal basis," Gates said.

Lack of such clarity, Gates said, can lead to outright suspicion.

In response, the top ranking Chinese official at the forum took aim at US missile defense policies ‚ which include plans for anti-missile defenses with Japan, as well as the deployment of missile defense sites in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Lt. Gen. Ma Xiaotian, deputy chief of the General Staff for the People’s Liberation Army, said developing such an offensive ‚ rather than purely defensive ‚ system could tip the balance of power and threaten peace.

"We do not support either side to take the initiative to break the balance," he said. He also said dismissed claims that China’s military is dramatically expanding. China’s spending on defence, he said, is low.

Gates has consistently sounded a more conciliatory tone toward China, which he visited late last year for high-level meetings with the country’s leaders. However, relations have been strained by revelations in March that the US military mistakenly delivered fuses for long-range missiles to Taiwan, triggering a strong protest from Beijing.

On Friday, Gates declined to discuss the lengthy report he received Tuesday on the blunder and, more broadly, on the Pentagon’s handling of nuclear-related materials.

Gates, who has made four major trips to Asia during his 17-month tenure as Pentagon chief, has also suggested that the US ‚ as a Pacific nation ‚ has been a key factor in the ability of other Asian countries to grow and prosper.

In another veiled reference to China, he said the US presence in the region has opened doors and protected "common spaces on the high seas, in space and, more and more, in the cyber world."

US officials have suspected the Chinese of trying to hack into US government computers. In one instance, a number of Pentagon computers had to be taken off line for several days ‚ but officials never openly blamed China.

Gates was scheduled to leave Singapore on Sunday and then visit defence leaders in Thailand and South Korea.


Feel the passion for press freedom ignite within you.

Join us as a valued contributor to our vibrant community, where your voice harmonizes with the symphony of truth. Together, we'll amplify the power of free journalism.

Lost Password?