Guest contributor
Kannikar Petchkaew
Anutin Charnvirakul, the Prime Minister of Thailand, has made headlines as the first leader in the 11-member Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries to send a congratulatory message to Min Aung Hlaing, the military general and architect of the 2021 coup who assumed the presidency in Myanmar.
He broke “ASEAN rank,” The Irrawaddy reported.
In his letter to Min Aung Hlaing, Anutin stated the two countries “have long enjoyed close and friendly relations grounded in mutual respect, shared interests, and strong people-to-people ties” and that Thailand stands ready to support Myanmar’s efforts towards peace, stability, and national development.
“I am confident that, under Your Excellency’s able leadership, relations between our two countries will continue to grow from strength to strength,” Anutin added.
The full copy of this letter could be found only in The Global New Light of Myanmar. It spent almost the entire week publishing congratulatory letters from foreign leaders in its pages. Including another letter from Thailand’s Minister of Foreign Affairs.
It also published a photograph of Parnpree Bahiddha-Nukara, Thailand’s Chief Advisor and Special Envoy of the Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs, shaking the hand of Min Aung Hlaing during a visit to Naypyidaw on April 10.
This photo of a high-level Thai diplomat meeting with Min Aung Hlaing in recognition of his presidency was later shared by Myanmar and Thai media.
There’s no surprise about this in Bangkok. With or without Anutin as Prime Minister, Thailand will always work on its own when it comes to Myanmar within ASEAN even if the 2026 Chair the Philippines has decided not to recognize Min Aung Hlaing as president of Myanmar. Yet.
No letter of congratulations from the Philippines’ President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. was published in The Global New Light of Myanmar. Instead, Malacañang Palace said it would “continue to engage” Myanmar in carefully neutral language.
“The Philippines will continue to engage relevant authorities and stakeholders in Myanmar through Foreign Affairs Secretary Ma. Theresa Lazaro, in her capacity as Special Envoy of the ASEAN Chair to Myanmar, as well as through our respective embassies,” the palace stated.
Lazaro announced a few weeks ago that ASEAN is considering a review of its Five-Point Consensus on Myanmar, as the Philippines carries on after Indonesia and Malaysia believing in this peace plan drafted five years ago, in April 2021.
Thailand never shies away from the fact that it protects its own economic interests over any other country’s political or humanitarian concerns. Despite the sanctions against the military junta in Myanmar, Thailand is its biggest client for natural gas.
While ASEAN, under heavy criticism since 2021 for being unable to help Myanmar solve its problems, has at least barred junta leaders from high-level summits.
Thailand, on the other hand, has hosted informal meetings with Myanmar junta officials. It has also supported humanitarian aid delivery through state channels and emphasized “constructive engagement” rather than isolation.
What’s wrong with Bangkok? Why does it behave so differently from Manila and other ASEAN countries? Geographic reality has it all.
While Manila is a three-hour flight away. Thailand shares an 2,400-km-long porous border with Myanmar and has long faced armed conflict spillover, refugees, and disrupted trade.
The calculus is easy to read. Bangkok wants to prevent war from producing uncontrolled refugee flows, conflict along the border, as well as transnational crime, and economic disruption.
Thai policy over Myanmar is usually framed around stability, manageability, and engagement with whoever holds power across the frontier, rather than around sanctions or political isolation.
It is best understood as security management first and principle second, neither a straightforward supporter of Myanmar’s military nor a consistent defender of Myanmar’s democratic opposition.
Thailand is a pragmatic border state trying to preserve leverage and protect its own interests. This reflects its longstanding doctrine of working with whoever controls Naypyidaw.
Despite the flashy headline in The Global New Light of Myanmar stating that Min Aung Hlaing is the “elected president,” Thailand has no reason to rush to congratulate him.
If you ask yourself, why has this country not taken a stand against the dictatorship and the violence inflicted on its own people?
Thailand has lived under its own military junta long enough to know that withholding recognition would not dislodge the military from power—but it would narrow Thailand’s room to manage immediate security risks along its border.
Thai foreign policy is also shaped by domestic realities. With a long history of military influence in politics, the country’s civil–military dynamics tend to favor a stability-first approach in diplomacy, often taking precedence over human rights-based positioning.
And if this looks like a full-throated endorsement from Bangkok, there are some fun facts for us to consider.
Beyond the prominently displayed coverage in the Global New Light of Myanmar, there is little trace of Anutin’s congratulatory message on official Thai state websites.
Neither the Thai government’s social media nor the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Thailand—which routinely publicizes high-level meetings and diplomatic gestures—posted any acknowledgment, imagery, or statement marking the occasion.
The only official trace is more subdued: photographs on the foreign ministry’s website showing Parnpree delivering congratulations in his capacity to the new president as chief advisor and special envoy to the minister.
But what appeared in the report was a visit by a “former deputy prime minister and minister of foreign affairs of Thailand”; Parnpree had resigned from these positions in mid-2024.
Parnpree is a credible envoy—a seasoned diplomat, a former foreign minister and deputy prime minister, and a figure who has dealt directly with border tensions as fighting between the Myanmar military and ethnic armed groups has spilled into Thai territory.
But it is equally accurate to say that, today, he serves only as an advisor.
No congratulatory message to Myanmar’s new president appears on the ministry’s official website. Yet the letter sent to Aung San Suu Kyi after her 2015 landslide victory is still publicly available there today.
What emerges in Naypyidaw is not a clear signal of diplomatic embrace but a carefully managed ambiguity: acknowledgment without amplification, contact without visibility.
A single advisor, dispatched without fanfare and largely absent from official channels, delivered the message, leaving open a more pointed question.
If recognition is meant to signal legitimacy, what does it mean when it is delivered so quietly that it is almost invisible?
To me. It’s like being invited out with friends but told, gently, no photos.
Kannikar Petchkaew is an independent journalist who has spent over 30 years covering mainland Southeast Asia. With two decades devoted to the suffering of the people of Myanmar.
DVB publishes a diversity of opinions that does not reflect DVB editorial policy. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our stories: [email protected]
